Google Maps Is Different Depending on Your Location
Articles Blog

Google Maps Is Different Depending on Your Location

March 13, 2020

The question of what we should believe and
what we shouldn’t can be somewhat arbitrary. And even though we might have a spontaneous
gut feeling of whether something is believable or not, can we really explain our reasoning
for it? If you go on Google Maps in Japan, the region
between South Korea and Japan is shown as the “Sea of Japan”. However if you’re using Google Maps inside
South Korea, it will instead appear by the name “East Sea”. Two names for the same body of water on the
same site. Which name is displayed depends on the location
that you’re browsing from. For the past two decades Japan and South Korea
have been in a dispute over what the sea should be called. While South Koreans refer to the waters that
surround their country as the West Sea, South Sea and East Sea; in Japan this body of water
is traditionally called the Sea of Japan, a name that also is more internationally accepted. The arguments on both sides are complex – South
Korea argues that the name “Sea of Japan” was pushed during the time Korea was under
Japanese occupation, meaning South Korea couldn’t internationally dispute it. Japan on the other hand argues that the name
has been used long before the occupation and has been the historical internationally recognised
name. In international politics, there are many
disputes over naming things. But when there are arguments about names of
regions or entire seas, things that are essential to normal communication, how can we neutrally
talk about it? Cartographers have had the challenging job
of handling naming disputes like this for centuries. And there are a few ways to deal with this. Either by choosing one of the names, by printing
both versions next to each other, as two equal alternatives or as a mainly accepted one and
an alternative name, or by simply leaving the disputed area completely blank. Google however chooses a different approach. Google Maps avoids such conflict by showing
different maps to different people. An approach only possible for an online map
service. A similar situation exists in the middle east,
between Arab countries and Iran. On the international version of Google Maps
you will find the “Persian Gulf”. However if you zoom in more, you will also
see the name “Arabian Gulf”. Whereas Iran argues that the sea has consistently
been called Persian Gulf throughout history. Conflicts like these may seem absurd, but
between two rivalling countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia, both claiming a leading
role in the region, the name has a tremendous cultural and political significance. In many countries it is against the law to
publish maps that contradict the official government maps. Therefore Google has the choice of either
adapting to these laws or to not offer Google Maps in those countries. The fact that some countries regulate maps
by law is an indicator of how politically significant they can be, as they can either
confirm or put to question geographical claims. Another example of this is China and India. Both countries claim this area which is designated
as “Arunachal Pradesh” by India, which governs it. And as long as you are using the site from
an Indian domain, Google Maps will show it as an Indian state. China, on the other hand calls the area southern
Tibet and Chinese Google users will see the area as a part of China. In both countries Google doesn’t show the
users that there is a border conflict. Only when using the site outside of both nations
the map indicates the controversy by rendering dotted border lines. The same applies to Kashmir, an area which
is in parts claimed by India, China as well as Pakistan. When Google is used in China and India the
official maps of their respective governments are shown. Rendering the border as a continuous line
conceals the dispute and makes the borderline seem internationally recognised. While Google has to obey the countries laws,
they also don’t want to anger customers in those countries. Leaving out growth markets like China or India
would be a huge economic disadvantage. Now, the fact that Google even offers a map
in China is a bit surprising, considering that the company is in a long disagreement
with the authorities. In 2010, Google decided to relocate its services
from mainland China to Hong Kong, in order to avoid the Chinese firewall, which required
them to censor search results. Ever since, Google has become rather insignificant
in China, but the company still keeps offering their map service. Both in the conflict with India, as well as
with Taiwan, Google Maps in China corresponds with the official government viewpoint. And the map even shows the 10-Dash Line. A line that originates from a Chinese map
from 1947 and is used by the country to justify its claim on several islands in the South
Chinese Sea. This area is disputed by many countries. The cause of the conflicts are the rich fishing
grounds, ressources in the sea as well as the military importance of controlling the
area. If countries convincingly argue a claim over
a sea, they can use that to justify exclusive rights. The crimean peninsula is disputed between
Ukraine and Russia. The conflict broke out in 2014 and ever since
a controversial referendum, Russia regards Crimea as its territory. A large part of the international community
however considers this a violation of international law. While the international version of google
shows a dotted line, the Ukrainian version doesn’t immediately show this. Only when zooming in much closer we see the
line. Russian Google Maps however shows Crimea as
part of Russia. Google is in the difficult position where
there is not really any approach to draw a map that would not offend somebody. And even though it may be a power that Google
doesn’t want, it has to deal with the responsibilities that come with it. If Google draws a straight border in an area
that is disputed – Google is creating facts that do have strong impact on the real situation
on the ground. Now let’s take a look at how another website
handles this. The collaborative Wikipedia project also struggles
to neutrally portray border conflicts. There are long-lasting discussions between
the authors on the correct way of dealing with disputes. In the Crimean conflict, this has even led
to the peninsula being shown as Russian territory on the Russian language wikipedia, while the
Ukrainian site claims it as part of Ukraine. In both countries, there is information available
about the dispute, yet how the borders are rendered changes from time to time. In both countries the articles are available
and Wikipedia wasn’t blocked. The fact that Wikipedia would show disputes,
even if that puts the site at risk of being blocked can be seen by them switching their
web protocol. In the past, countries were able to censor
individual articles from the site. For example, sexually explicit content was
blocked in Turkey and an article about Marijruhanna was blocked in Russia. But since Wikipedia changed to the new encrypted
protocol, the only censorship option countries have is to block Wikipedia in int’s entirety,
not just single articles. And Wikipedia is currently blocked in China. Whether Google wants it or not, since they
are the main player in online maps, they have enormous power and responsibility. Because the map that Google shows will be
the map that a lot of people believe. Maps should always be viewed critically. Not only since Google. It is important to recognise that even things
which at first glance seem to be objective truths may be more subjective. Behind every map, also Google Maps, there
is an approach. And that doesn’t mean they are bad maps,
just that we should view them critically, since the decisions mapmakers make affect
our view of the world every day.

Only registered users can comment.

  1. I really like the way the editing was on this video tbh. Also; a little side note, you should've mentioned the Venezuela -Guyana border dispute aswell.

  2. Why is it the Gulf of Basra in Turkish? I know Basra is a town in Iraq that borders it but thats weird.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *